{"id":5039,"date":"2021-04-27T15:22:40","date_gmt":"2021-04-27T15:22:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/?post_type=chapters&p=5039"},"modified":"2021-05-07T14:12:12","modified_gmt":"2021-05-07T14:12:12","slug":"confidentiality-and-neutrality-of-review-processes-and-discussions","status":"publish","type":"chapters","link":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/code-of-conduct\/confidentiality-and-neutrality-of-review-processes-and-discussions\/","title":{"rendered":"Confidentiality and neutrality of review processes and discussions"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Fair behaviour is the basis for the legitimacy of any judgement-forming process. Researchers who evaluate submitted manuscripts, funding proposals or personal qualifications are obliged to maintain strict confidentiality with regard to this process. They disclose all facts that could give rise to the appearance of a conflict of interest. The duty of confidentiality and disclosure of facts that could give rise to the appearance of a conflict of interest also applies to members of research advisory and decision-making bodies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Explanations:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The confidentiality of third-party material to which a reviewer or committee member gains access precludes sharing the material with third parties or making personal use of it. Researchers immediately disclose to the responsible body any potential or apparent conflicts of interest, bias or favouritism relating to the research project being reviewed or the person or matter being discussed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Fair behaviour is the basis for the legitimacy of any judgement-forming process. Researchers who evaluate submitted manuscripts, funding proposals or personal qualifications are obliged to maintain strict confidentiality with regard to this process. They disclose all facts that could give rise to the appearance of a conflict of interest. The duty of confidentiality and disclosure […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":0,"template":"","kommentar_tags":[],"class_list":["post-5039","chapters","type-chapters","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nConfidentiality and neutrality of review processes and discussions - Wissenschaftliche Integrit\u00e4t<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/code-of-conduct\/confidentiality-and-neutrality-of-review-processes-and-discussions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Confidentiality and neutrality of review processes and discussions - Wissenschaftliche Integrit\u00e4t\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Fair behaviour is the basis for the legitimacy of any judgement-forming process. Researchers who evaluate submitted manuscripts, funding proposals or personal qualifications are obliged to maintain strict confidentiality with regard to this process. They disclose all facts that could give rise to the appearance of a conflict of interest. The duty of confidentiality and disclosure […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/code-of-conduct\/confidentiality-and-neutrality-of-review-processes-and-discussions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Wissenschaftliche Integrit\u00e4t\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-05-07T14:12:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/dfg-wissenschaftliche-integritaet-defaultimage.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2324\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1474\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/en\\\/code-of-conduct\\\/confidentiality-and-neutrality-of-review-processes-and-discussions\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/en\\\/code-of-conduct\\\/confidentiality-and-neutrality-of-review-processes-and-discussions\\\/\",\"name\":\"Confidentiality and neutrality of review processes and discussions - Wissenschaftliche Integrit\u00e4t\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-04-27T15:22:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-05-07T14:12:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/en\\\/code-of-conduct\\\/confidentiality-and-neutrality-of-review-processes-and-discussions\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/en\\\/code-of-conduct\\\/confidentiality-and-neutrality-of-review-processes-and-discussions\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/en\\\/code-of-conduct\\\/confidentiality-and-neutrality-of-review-processes-and-discussions\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Confidentiality and neutrality of review processes and discussions\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/\",\"name\":\"Wissenschaftliche Integrit\u00e4t\",\"description\":\"Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft e.V.\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/GWP-Logo-v20200213@2x.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/GWP-Logo-v20200213@2x.png\",\"width\":252,\"height\":70,\"caption\":\"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft e.V.\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Confidentiality and neutrality of review processes and discussions - Wissenschaftliche Integrit\u00e4t","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/code-of-conduct\/confidentiality-and-neutrality-of-review-processes-and-discussions\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Confidentiality and neutrality of review processes and discussions - Wissenschaftliche Integrit\u00e4t","og_description":"Fair behaviour is the basis for the legitimacy of any judgement-forming process. Researchers who evaluate submitted manuscripts, funding proposals or personal qualifications are obliged to maintain strict confidentiality with regard to this process. They disclose all facts that could give rise to the appearance of a conflict of interest. The duty of confidentiality and disclosure […]","og_url":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/code-of-conduct\/confidentiality-and-neutrality-of-review-processes-and-discussions\/","og_site_name":"Wissenschaftliche Integrit\u00e4t","article_modified_time":"2021-05-07T14:12:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2324,"height":1474,"url":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/dfg-wissenschaftliche-integritaet-defaultimage.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/code-of-conduct\/confidentiality-and-neutrality-of-review-processes-and-discussions\/","url":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/code-of-conduct\/confidentiality-and-neutrality-of-review-processes-and-discussions\/","name":"Confidentiality and neutrality of review processes and discussions - Wissenschaftliche Integrit\u00e4t","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-04-27T15:22:40+00:00","dateModified":"2021-05-07T14:12:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/code-of-conduct\/confidentiality-and-neutrality-of-review-processes-and-discussions\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/code-of-conduct\/confidentiality-and-neutrality-of-review-processes-and-discussions\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/code-of-conduct\/confidentiality-and-neutrality-of-review-processes-and-discussions\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Confidentiality and neutrality of review processes and discussions"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/#website","url":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/","name":"Wissenschaftliche Integrit\u00e4t","description":"Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/#organization","name":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft e.V.","url":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/GWP-Logo-v20200213@2x.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/GWP-Logo-v20200213@2x.png","width":252,"height":70,"caption":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft e.V."},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/chapters\/5039","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapters"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/chapters\/5039\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5527,"href":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/chapters\/5039\/revisions\/5527"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5039"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kommentar_tags","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kommentar_tags?post=5039"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}