ForewordPreamble

Principles

Guideline 1: Commitment to the general principlesGuideline 2: Professional ethicsGuideline 3: Organisational responsibility of heads of research institutionsGuideline 4: Responsibility of the heads of research work unitsGuideline 5: Dimensions of performance and assessment criteriaGuideline 6: Ombudspersons

Research Process

Guideline 7: Cross-phase quality assuranceGuideline 8: Stakeholders, responsibilities and rolesGuideline 9: Research design

 

Guideline 10: Legal and ethical frameworks, usage rightsGuideline 11: Methods and standardsGuideline 12: DocumentationGuideline 13: Providing public access to research resultsGuideline 14: AuthorshipGuideline 15: Publication mediumGuideline 16: Confidentiality and neutrality of review processes and discussionsGuideline 17: Archiving

Non-Compliance with Good Research Practice, Procedures

Guideline 18: Complainants and respondentsGuideline 19: Procedures in cases of alleged research misconductImplementation of the Guidelines
ForewordPreamblePrinzipienGuideline 1: Commitment to the general principlesGuideline 2: Professional ethicsGuideline 3: Organisational responsibility of heads of research institutionsGuideline 4: Responsibility of the heads of research work unitsGuideline 5: Dimensions of performance and assessment criteriaGuideline 6: OmbudspersonsForschungsprozessGuideline 7: Cross-phase quality assuranceGuideline 8: Stakeholders, responsibilities and rolesGuideline 9: Research designGuideline 10: Legal and ethical frameworks, usage rightsGuideline 11: Methods and standardsGuideline 12: DocumentationGuideline 13: Providing public access to research resultsGuideline 14: AuthorshipGuideline 15: Publication mediumGuideline 16: Confidentiality and neutrality of review processes and discussionsGuideline 17: ArchivingNichtbeachtung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis, VerfahrenGuideline 18: Complainants and respondentsGuideline 19: Procedures in cases of alleged research misconductImplementation of the Guidelines
Keyword Index
The Code of Conduct
| Print

Comments - Engineering/engineering sciences (20)

Documentation concept

03.12.2020 – Even in the planning phase of a research project, it is important to consider conceptual questions regarding data management as well as the documentation of project progression, methods and results.

Comment on: GL12 (Engineering/engineering sciences) , GL12 (Natural sciences)

Quality assurance in the engineering sciences

03.12.2020 – A clear interpretation of results is sometimes made difficult by the complexity of the problem.

Comment on: GL7 (Engineering/engineering sciences)

Separation of basic research and contract research

03.12.2020 – When working on projects outside of basic research, such areas must be clearly separated.

Comment on: GL4 (Engineering/engineering sciences)

Standards/references

03.12.2020 – In the engineering sciences, a standard is something that is arrived at the end of a prolonged process. In the context of research in this field, it makes more sense to regard a standard as a point of reference.

Comment on: GL11 (Engineering/engineering sciences)

Statutory requirements

03.12.2020 – In addition to legal requirements, occupational health and safety regulations and certifications also have to be observed.

Comment on: GL10 (Engineering/engineering sciences) , GL10 (Legal Framework)

General (53)

Research areas

Humanities and social sciences (5)Engineering/engineering sciences (20)Life sciences (21)Natural sciences (29)
Practical examples (7)
Legal Framework (3)
faq (10)
Link list (18)
Statements (11)
|